Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 13;108(5):1335–1348. doi: 10.1152/jn.00972.2011

Table 2.

Experiment 2 ANOVA results for condition by time interaction and follow-up t-tests

Epoch, ms
0–100
100–200
200–300
300–400
400–500
500–600
600–700
700–800
Location of Channel Groups F Value F(7,70) P t P t P t P t P t P t P t P t P
Midline prefrontal 4.25 0.012 1.93 0.08 1.52 0.16 1.44 0.18 −1.71 0.12 −0.28 0.78 −1.46 0.18 −4.13 0.002 −3.69 0.004
Left frontal 3.10 0.061
Midline frontal 2.44 0.080
Right Frontal 3.02 0.040 −0.23 0.82 2.80 0.02 1.99 0.07 −1.49 0.17 0.69 0.51 0.44 0.67 1.59 0.14 −3.01 0.01
Left Central 1.72 0.185
Midline central 6.68 0.002 −1.91 0.09 −1.92 0.08 −0.54 0.60 4.47 0.001 3.41 0.007 2.65 0.02 2.35 0.04 5.29 4.E-04
Right central 2.15 0.125
Left parietal 1.04 0.393
Midline parietal 4.72 0.014 −1.66 0.13 −1.18 0.26 −1.83 0.10 0.20 0.85 1.15 0.28 2.07 0.06 1.68 0.12 2.74 0.02
Right parietal 0.75 0.492
Left temporal 1.19 0.329
Right temporal 1.09 0.350
Midline occipital 4.84 0.004 2.79 0.02 1.38 0.2 −0.49 0.64 −2.35 0.04 −4.12 0.002 −2.64 0.02 −1.04 0.32 −0.57 0.58

Two-way repeated-measures ANOVA (8 time bins × 2 transitions) was performed. Corresponding F values and Greenhouse-Geisser-corrected P values are shown. Each significant interaction was followed up with individual t-tests and considered significant with a Bonferroni-corrected P value <0.00625. Corresponding t-values and P values are shown. ROIs with significant interactions followed by significant t-tests are highlighted in bold. Significant P values are highlighted in bold.