Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Ophthalmol. 2012 Oct 27;155(2):342–353.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.07.023

Table 3.

Demographic and ocular features of Glaucoma Genes and Environment (GLAUGEN) and National Eye Institute Glaucoma Human Genetics Collaboration (NEIGHBOR) cases with binary glaucoma feature variables.

GLAUGEN NEIGHBOR
Variable % > cutoff N % > cutoff N
Age at diagnosis ≥ 65 years 49.3 976 56.5 1971
Gender (% female) 58.4 976 52.1 1971
Intraocular pressure ≥ 22 mm Hg at diagnosis 67.0 976 79.4 1219
Cup-disc ratio ≥ 0.6 at diagnosis 69.9 458 n/a n/a
Cup-disc ratio ≥ 0.6 at DNA collection 96.3 485 95.8 1611
Laser trabeculoplasty 28.2 976 36.8 38
Incisional glaucoma surgery 15.1 976 55.0 40
Pattern standard deviation ≥ 6 decibels 39.8 802 45.4 1119
Mean defect ≤ −13 decibels 14.6 849 26.6 1357
Peripheral visual field loss only* 52.1 963 31.5 1423
Paracentral visual field loss only * 17.9 963 3.0 1423
Both peripheral and paracentral visual field loss* 30.0 963 65.1 1423
Superior visual field loss only* 38.8 963 27.6 1423
Inferior visual field loss only* 30.3 963 21.2 1423
Both superior and inferior visual field loss* 28.8 963 50.7 1423
*

These visual field loss attributes are applied on a per patient basis. For instance, peripheral visual field loss only means that one or both eyes of a patient have peripheral visual field loss and neither has paracentral field loss.

Abbreviations used: DNA= Deoxyribonucleic acid; n/a=not available

NB: Certain phenotype features were absent on some subsets of GLAUGEN and NEIGHBOR. We included data on CDR >0.6 at diagnosis from the Nurses Health Study (NHS) and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS) subsets of GLAUGEN. We included data on CDR>0.6 at DNA collection from the Mass Eye and Ear Infirmary (MEEI) subset of GLAUGEN and all NEIGHBOR sites. For laser trabeculoplasty and incisional glaucoma surgery we included data from GLAUGEN as well as the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study and Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study sub sites of NEIGHBOR. Missing data for the visual field parameters (mean defects and pattern standard deviation) solely reflects the fact that some participants had visual field tests other than Humphrey tests. Missing data for parameters related to the pattern of visual loss (e.g. peripheral visual field loss only) occurred for several reasons including visual field loss was confounded from deficits not attributable to glaucoma like age-related macula or tests assessed segments outside the range of the central 24 or 30 degrees.