. 2012 Jul 11;108(7):1977–1987. doi: 10.1152/jn.00905.2011

Table 1.

Locations and responses of TSS cells

Cell	Site	Stim	RS	z	d′	Bird
1	HVC	Tut	10.91 ± 4.83	10.10	0.93	B84
1	HVC	Juv	6.27 ± 8.76	3.20
2	HVC	Tut	5.02 ± 1.45	15.52	2.68
2	HVC	Mun	1.40 ± 2.28	2.28
3	—	Tut	6.60 ± 2.11	14.01	1.55	B90
3	—	FLC	4.22 ± 2.26	8.33
4	HVC	Tut	2.00 ± 1.76	5.07	0.93	G366
4	HVC	ConAM	0.85 ± 1.76	2.15
5	HVC	Tut	5.19 ± 3.55	6.55	0.87	Y45
5	HVC	Unf	3.40 ± 2.15	7.08
6	HVC	Tut	2.32 ± 2.49	4.18	0.90
6	HVC	BF	0.92 ± 1.89	2.19
7	pHVC	Tut	2.77 ± 1.60	7.75	1.86	Y81
7	pHVC	Mun	0.71 ± 1.54	2.05
8	pHVC	Tut	4.31 ± 1.96	9.83	1.74	Y100
8	pHVC	Beg	1.04 ± 3.20	1.46
9	HVC	Tut	3.52 ± 2.21	7.13	1.14	B183
9	HVC	Unf	1.46 ± 2.88	2.27
10	NCL	Tut	5.55 ± 3.39	7.33	2.46	B190
10	NCL	Unf	0.36 ± 2.51	0.65
11	NCL	Tut	0.83 ± 1.14	3.23	1.50
11	NCL	Fam	−0.20 ± 0.75	−1.21
12	NCL	Tut	1.70 ± 4.08	1.87	1.28
12	NCL	Unf	−1.83 ± 3.74	−2.19
13	pHVC	Tut	2.20 ± 1.66	5.94	1.59
13	pHVC	Unf	0.64 ± 1.04	2.77
14	NCL	Tut	1.42 ± 0.97	6.54	1.22
14	NCL	JuvAM	0.44 ± 1.28	1.55
15	NCL	Tut	7.90 ± 3.79	9.32	2.40	B208
15	NCL	Fam	2.28 ± 2.76	3.69
16	NCL	Tut	0.99 ± 1.24	3.60	1.21	B209
16	NCL	Fam	0.17 ± 0.59	1.29
17	NCL	Tut	1.71 ± 2.03	3.76	1.05
17	NCL	Fam	0.40 ± 1.44	1.24
18	NCL	Tut	3.82 ± 2.99	5.71	1.52
18	NCL	JuvAM	1.39 ± 1.12	5.55
19	NCL	Tut	6.88 ± 2.55	12.06	1.52	B210
19	NCL	WN	4.28 ± 2.27	8.41

For each neuron, the responses to the 2 strongest stimuli (Stim) are shown; see text for description of stimuli. TSS, tutor song selective; pHVC, paraHVC; NCL, caudal lateral nidopallium; RS, response strength (Hz, mean ± SD across trials); z, z score of RS (Theunissen et al. 2004); d′,d-prime statistic quantifying discriminability between tutor song and next strongest stimulus. Cells 1–8 are from study 1 and cells 9–19 from study 2. The recording site of cell 3 was not recovered.