Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2012 Dec 20;142(1):136–147. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.11.006

Table 1. Means (and Standard Errors) of Subject Characteristics.

Experiment 1
Measure YoungStandard YoungVigilance OldStandard OldVigilance
Education 12.85 (0.18) 12.98 (0.20) 15.22 (0.39) 15.62 (0.36)
Medicationa 0.66 (0.18) 0.77 (0.16) 2.39 (0.27) 2.64 (0.33)
Vocabularya 28.05 (0.44) 28.26 (0.48) 33.63 (0.47) 34.20 (0.44)
Digit symba 60.62 (1.32) 63.65 (1.82) 51.14 (1.89) 50.40 (1.73)
DS memorya 7.93 (0.19) 7.67 (0.23) 5.80 (0.31) 5.92 (0.33)
Experiment 2
Measure Young1-back Young2-back Old1-back Old2-back

Education 12.41 (0.11) 12.70 (0.15) 15.58 (0.38) 15.00 (0.42)
Medicationa 0.70 (0.14) 0.82 (0.16) 2.35 (0.25) 3.12 (0.34)
Vocabularya 27.96 (0.43) 27.84 (0.47) 33.86 (0.43) 33.05 (0.56)
Digit symba 61.76 (1.49) 62.21 (1.25) 49.00 (1.81) 46.14 (2.04)
DS memorya 7.65 (0.25) 7.59 (0.23) 5.23 (0.38) 4.93 (0.37)

Note. Education = number of years education completed; medication = self-reported number of medications taken daily; vocabulary = number correct out of 40 on the Shipley Vocabulary Test (Zachary, 1986); digit symb = WAIS Digit-Symbol subtest (Wechsler, 1981); DS memory = symbol recall following the WAIS Digit-Symbol subtest (Wechsler, 1981); Standard = subjects completing the standard, go/no-go, version of the SART; Vigilance = subjects completing the vigilance version of the SART; 1-back = subjects completing the 1-back task; 2-back = subjects completing the 2-back task.

a

Age comparison p < .05. No comparisons of, or interactions with, the task-condition variables were significant. No statistical comparison of education was made because the young adults were currently enrolled at a university.