Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 15;108(9):2419–2429. doi: 10.1152/jn.01024.2011

Table 1.

Item vs. Relation and control contrast β weights

Relation Sample Relation Minus Item Item Load Pseudoword Load
IFJ 0.226 ± 0.05* 0.067 ± 0.04 ns 0.014 ± 0.09 ns
antPFC 0.201 ± 0.03* 0.020 ± 0.05 ns 0.014 ± 0.13 ns
IPL 0.060 ± 0.01* 0.045 ± 0.02 ns 0.028 ± 0.03 ns
Item Delay Item Minus Relation Relation Load Pseudoword Load
FEF 0.045 ± 0.01* 0.043 ± 0.03 ns 0.027 ± 0.02 ns
IPS 0.065 ± 0.03* 0.014 ± 0.03 ns 0.058 ± 0.05 ns
BA18 0.079 ± 0.03* 0.045 ± 0.03 ns 0.057 ± 0.05 ns

β weights (±SE), representing percent signal change, for Relation vs. Item contrast in regions shown in Fig. 2, along with those for relevant control contrasts. IFJ, inferior frontal junction; antPFC, anterior prefrontal cortex; IPL, inferior parietal lobule; FEF, frontal eye fields; IPS, intraparietal sulcus; BA18, Brodmann area 18.

*

P < 0.05; ns, not significant.