Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb;33(1):1–23. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.001

Table 3.

Summary of tasks used to assess clinical aspects of imagery.

Domain Task Author Format
Re-experiencing Script driven imagery procedures Original: Lang et al. (1983)
Variant: Pitman et al. (2002)
Variant: Lanius et al. (2001, 2002)
Variant: Rauch et al. (1996)
Variant: Shin et al. (1997)
Verbal
Intrusions/flashbacks Impact of Event Scale Original: Horowitz et al. (1979) Pen and paper
Impact of Event scale—Revised Original: Weiss and Marmer (1997) Pen and paper
Intrusion Triggering Task Original: Holmes, James, Coode-Bate, and Deeprose (2009)
Variant: Lang et al. (2009)
Computerised
Intrusion Diaries Original: Davies and Clark (1998)
Variant: Holmes et al. (2004)
Original: Holmes et al. (2005)
Pen and paper
Verbal
Intrusions Interview Orignal: Patel et al. (2007) Verbal
Prospective Imagery Impact of Future Events Scale Original: Deeprose and Holmes (2010) Pen and paper
Autobiographical Memory and Future Cueing Task Original: Williams et al. (1996)
Variant: D'Argembeau et al. (2008)
Verbal
Prospective Imagery Task Original: Stöber (2000)
Variant: Holmes, Lang, Moulds, and Steele (2008)
Pen and paper
Bias in Imagery Cognitive Bias Modification Task Original: Holmes et al. (2006)
Variant: Holmes, Lang, and Shah (2009)
Variant: Blackwell and Holmes (2010)
Variant: Steel et al. (2010)
Variant: T.J. Lang et al. (2012)
Computerised
Ambiguous Sentences Test Original: Berna, Vincent, et al. (2011) Computerised
Homograph Interpretation Task Original: Hertel et al. (2003)
Variant: Holmes, Lang et al. (2008)
Variant: Holmes et al. (2011)
Pen and paper/Computerised