Skip to main content
. 2011 Dec 4;110(3):1103–1117. doi: 10.1007/s11205-011-9974-7

Table 2.

OLS regression analyses of the relative emphasis on deservingness criteria (unstandardized regression coefficients, N = 1760)

Control Need Reciprocity
Model 1a Model 1b Model 2a Model 2b Model 3a Model 3b
Intercept −0.044 −0.598*** −0.124 −0.592*** −0.194 −0.936***
Woman 0.026 0.061 0.130** 0.150*** 0.066 0.108**
Age (ref <31 years)
 31–45 −0.023 −0.034 0.009 0.012 −0.021 −0.015
 46–64 0.109 0.105 −0.132** −0.139* −0.027 0.027
 >64 0.462*** 0.398*** 0.063 0.021 0.298*** 0.217**
Educational level (ref = high)
 Low 0.316*** 0.272*** 0.049 0.032 0.059 0.012
 Middle 0.055 0.030 −0.060 −0.067 0.046 0.020
Work status (ref = unemployed)
 Employed −0.197* −0.273*** 0.061 0.030 0.171 0.098
 Other −0.259** −0.336*** −0.007 −0.046 −0.030 −0.104
Income level (ref = high)
 Low −0.005 0.030 0.199** 0.220*** −0.012 0.010
 Low middle 0.050 0.083 0.326*** 0.335*** 0.088 0.116*
 High middle 0.000 0.009 0.011 0.007 −0.016 −0.004
Personal experience disability benefit −0.166** −0.155** −0.201*** −0.191*** −0.161** −0.158**
Housemates experience disability benefit 0.130 0.120 −0.324*** −0.329*** −0.097 −0.093
Political stance (left–right) 0.055*** 0.009 0.060***
Work ethic 0.090*** 0.098*** 0.131***
Religious denomination (ref. Catholic)
 No religion 0.058 0.162*** 0.046
 Protestant −0.047 0.147** −0.084
 Other −0.298*** −0.034 −0.078
R 2 0.055 0.081 0.042 0.054 0.019 0.048
F change 7.838*** 9.674*** 5.892*** 4.500*** 2.599*** 10.585***

Source Welfare opinions survey in the Netherlands 2006 (own calculations)

*** P < .01; ** P < .05; * P < .10; ref = reference group