Table 2.
OLS regression analyses of the relative emphasis on deservingness criteria (unstandardized regression coefficients, N = 1760)
| Control | Need | Reciprocity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1a | Model 1b | Model 2a | Model 2b | Model 3a | Model 3b | |
| Intercept | −0.044 | −0.598*** | −0.124 | −0.592*** | −0.194 | −0.936*** |
| Woman | 0.026 | 0.061 | 0.130** | 0.150*** | 0.066 | 0.108** |
| Age (ref <31 years) | ||||||
| 31–45 | −0.023 | −0.034 | 0.009 | 0.012 | −0.021 | −0.015 |
| 46–64 | 0.109 | 0.105 | −0.132** | −0.139* | −0.027 | 0.027 |
| >64 | 0.462*** | 0.398*** | 0.063 | 0.021 | 0.298*** | 0.217** |
| Educational level (ref = high) | ||||||
| Low | 0.316*** | 0.272*** | 0.049 | 0.032 | 0.059 | 0.012 |
| Middle | 0.055 | 0.030 | −0.060 | −0.067 | 0.046 | 0.020 |
| Work status (ref = unemployed) | ||||||
| Employed | −0.197* | −0.273*** | 0.061 | 0.030 | 0.171 | 0.098 |
| Other | −0.259** | −0.336*** | −0.007 | −0.046 | −0.030 | −0.104 |
| Income level (ref = high) | ||||||
| Low | −0.005 | 0.030 | 0.199** | 0.220*** | −0.012 | 0.010 |
| Low middle | 0.050 | 0.083 | 0.326*** | 0.335*** | 0.088 | 0.116* |
| High middle | 0.000 | 0.009 | 0.011 | 0.007 | −0.016 | −0.004 |
| Personal experience disability benefit | −0.166** | −0.155** | −0.201*** | −0.191*** | −0.161** | −0.158** |
| Housemates experience disability benefit | 0.130 | 0.120 | −0.324*** | −0.329*** | −0.097 | −0.093 |
| Political stance (left–right) | 0.055*** | 0.009 | 0.060*** | |||
| Work ethic | 0.090*** | 0.098*** | 0.131*** | |||
| Religious denomination (ref. Catholic) | ||||||
| No religion | 0.058 | 0.162*** | 0.046 | |||
| Protestant | −0.047 | 0.147** | −0.084 | |||
| Other | −0.298*** | −0.034 | −0.078 | |||
| R 2 | 0.055 | 0.081 | 0.042 | 0.054 | 0.019 | 0.048 |
| F change | 7.838*** | 9.674*** | 5.892*** | 4.500*** | 2.599*** | 10.585*** |
Source Welfare opinions survey in the Netherlands 2006 (own calculations)
*** P < .01; ** P < .05; * P < .10; ref = reference group