. 2012 Dec 7;27(1):14–21. doi: 10.1038/eye.2012.235

Table 2. Refractive outcomes after the implantation of phakic refractive lens reported by different authors.

Authors	n (eyes)	Mean preop SE (D)	Follow-up (months)	Mean postop SE (D)	% Eyes within ±1 D	Efficacy index	Safety index
Hoyos et al⁴²	17	−18.46	12	−0.22±0.87	82
Hoyos et al⁴²	14	+7.77	12	−0.38±0.82	79
Pallikaris et al³⁸	34	−14.70±2.65	17.17 ±3.76	0.61±0.89	79
Koivula et al^{30, 33}	14	−9.19	12	−0.31±0.51
Koivula et al^30,33	6	+6.13	12	−0.60±0.63
Koivula and Zetterström⁴⁵	40	+5.90±2.51	12	−0.46±0.48	100	0.70	0.89
Jongsareejit³²	50	−12.54±4.22 (sph) −1.38±1.24 (cyl)	12	−0.23±0.38
Donoso et al²⁶	53	−17.27±4.58	8.0±9.4	−0.23±1.05	71.2	1.0	1.40
Verde et al³¹	91	−11.9±5.0	12		80	0.98	1.22
Gil Cazorla et al²⁹	16	+5.65±1.41	12	0.07±0.43	100	0.9	0.8
Portaliu et al⁴⁶	34	−14.08±4.00	72	−0.45±0.62	91.2
Pérez-Cambrodí et al⁵¹	35	−10.25±3.19	57.34 ±9.24	−0.11±0.36	97.14	1.16	1.26