Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2012 Sep 4;64:104–111. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.08.077

Table 2.

Estimated CMRO2 responses and CBF/CMRO2 coupling ratios (n) for different stimulus contrast levels (mean ± standard deviation for 9 healthy subjects), for two assumptions of the model parameters in Eq [1].

α =0.4, β =1.5 α =0.14, β =0.9
Contrast CMRO2 response (%) n (dimensionless) CMRO2 response (%) n (dimensionless)
Level 1 (11 cd/m2) 13.8 ± 6.9d 1.75 ± 0.25c,d 15.2 ± 7.7d 1.63 ± 0.34c,d
Level 2 (52 cd/m2) 18.3 ± 8.7 2.08 ± 0.53 19.3 ± 10.0 2.15 ± 0.99
Level 3 (94 cd/m2) 18.1 ± 5.4d 2.21 ± 0.36a 18.3 ± 6.1 2.25 ± 0.64 a
Level 4 (1036 cd/m2) 24.0 ± 6.9a,c 2.3 (assumed) 24.0 ± 6.9a 2.3 (assumed)
a

significant difference with contrast 1 with p < 0.05

b

significant difference with contrast 2 with p < 0.05

c

significant difference with contrast 3 with p < 0.05

d

significant difference with contrast 4 with p < 0.05