Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Aug 15.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 8;62(2):953–961. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.01.012

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The current view of the physiological basis of the BOLD response is more complex than what was modeled with the balloon model. The key difference is that current studies support a picture of CBF and CMRO2 responses driven in parallel by different aspects of neural activity, so that we must think of a hemodynamic response and a metabolic response as independent effects. The origin of the post-stimulus undershoot is still uncertain, although the original assumption of a pure CBV effect cannot explain all of the current experimental data. Instead, a useful focus now is between a hemodynamic hypothesis, including elements of both a CBF undershoot and a slow venous CBV recovery (as shown) or a metabolic hypothesis related to slow recovery of CMRO2.