Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 15.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Apr 5;20(6):1124–1130. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-1261

Table 3.

Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for risk of breast cancer associated with plasma level of Q10 and stratified by menopausal status, a nested case-control study within the Shanghai Women’s Health Study (SWHS), 1997–2006.

OR (95% CI) by quintile of plasma concentration of CoQ10
Case-
control
pairs
Q11 Q21 Q31 Q41 Q51 P for
trend
All women
340 1.55 (0.97–2.48) 1.14 (0.72–1.80) 1.00 (Ref) 1.11 (0.71–1.74) 0.97 (0.60–1.60) 0.09
Women with cases diagnosed > 1 year after blood draw
303 1.90 (1.14–3.16) 1.41 (0.87–2.30) 1.00 (Ref) 1.15 (0.71–1.87) 1.13 (0.66–1.91) 0.03

OR (95% CI) by menopausal status and quartile of CoQ10
Q12 Q22 Q32 Q42 P for Trend
Premenopausal women3
All 171 1.62 (0.91–2.89) 1.38 (0.78–2.44) 1.00 (Ref) 1.15 (0.65–2.02) 0.16
>1 year 152 1.89 (1.01–3.54) 1.70 (0.91–3.16) 1.00 (Ref) 1.25 (0.68–2.32) 0.09
Postmenopausal women3
All 169 1.35 (0.79–2.28) 1.04 (0.58–1.88) 1.00 (Ref) 0.96 (0.52–1.79) 0.24
>1 year 151 1.71 (0.95–3.09) 1.14 (0.60–2.15) 1.00 (Ref) 1.15 (0.59–2.23) 0.14
1

20th, 40th, 60th and 80th percentiles were 429.0, 536.0, 629.0, and 796.0 ng/ml, respectively for all subjects.

2

25th, 50th, and 75th percentiles were 417, 537, and 665 ng/ml respectively for premenopausal women; and 517.5, 633, and 825 ng/ml respectively for postmenopausal women.

3

P for interactions was 0.40.

A conditional logistic regression model was used whereby controls were matched to the index case by age, menopausal status at baseline, date of sample collection, time of sample collection, time interval after the last meal, and recent antibiotic use and additionally adjusted for age at 1st live birth (continuous).