Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 10;10:E06. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120088

Table 2. Confidence in Ability to Change Eating Habits From Baseline (March 2010) to Follow-up (June 2010), Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) Feasibility Study, North Carolina, 2010.

Factora All Control Intervention P Valueb Intervention Effect Estimate, Mean (SD)c P Value for Effectc
Confidence in ability to reduce dietary salt
Baseline 21.2 (3.8) 21.5 (4) 21.0 (4) .73 +3.3 (1.4) .03
Follow-up 21.6 (3.8) 19.8 (5) 23.1 (2) .03
Confidence in ability to reduce dietary fat
Baseline 22.1 (2.7) 22.5 (2) 21.9 (3) .59 +2.2 (0.9) .02
Follow-up 22.3 (2.6) 21.3 (3) 23.2 (2) .07
Confidence in ability to eat healthier snacks
Baseline 19.8 (3) 19.5 (3) 20.0 (3) .20 +2.8 (1.1) .02
Follow-up 19.8 (3.5) 18.0 (3) 21.2 (3) .02
Confidence in ability to stick with the DASH diet after study conclusion
Baseline 36 (3.7) 36.8 (2) 35.4 (5) .34 +1.7 (1.1) .14
Follow-up 36.7 (2.8) 36.1 (3) 37.5 (3) .20
a

Summary scales were created from a 28-item survey. Original survey items were coded using a Likert scale that ranged from 1 (I know I cannot) to 5 (I know I can). Each factor included 5 to 8 survey items; items were summarized to create a single factor value. Scale ranged from 25 to 40, based on the number of survey items included in the summary scale. Scales for confidence in ability to reduce dietary salt and dietary fat and to increase healthy snack consumption included 5 original survey items. The scale for confidence in the ability to adhere to the DASH diet after study conclusion included 8 original survey items.

b

Differences between intervention and control groups determined by analysis of covariance, adjusted for baseline measures.

c

Based on linear regression (12 weeks as outcome variable and baseline and randomization arm as predictors).