Skip to main content
. 2001 Jun 19;98(14):8012–8017. doi: 10.1073/pnas.121616198

Table 1.

STR profiles of HeLa lines

Trial identification Reported name Comparison with consensus Percent match SGM profile results
amg D18S1179 D21S11 D8S1179 FGA TH01 vWF
Consensus profile
X 16 27, 28 12, 13 18, 21 7 16, 18
1 43 HeLa Identical 100 X 16 27, 28 12, 13 18, 21 7 16, 18
2 229 HeLa Identical 100 X 16 27, 28 12, 13 18, 21 7 16, 18
3 243 HeLa Identical 100 X 16 27, 28 12, 13 18, 21 7 16, 18
4 162 HeLa S3 Identical 100 X 16 27, 28 12, 13 18, 21 7 16, 18
5 181 HeLa S3 Identical 100 X 16 27, 28 12, 13 18, 21 7 16, 18
6 169 Hep II Identical 100 X 16 27, 28 12, 13 18, 21 7 16, 18
7 254 Intestine 407 Identical 100 X 16 27, 28 12, 13 18, 21 7 16, 18
8 14H HPC36M Identical 100 X 16 27, 28 12, 13 18, 21 7 16, 18
9 127 KB FGA (18) loss 100 X 16 27, 28 12, 13 21 7 16, 18
10 183 KB FGA (18) loss 100 X 16 27, 28 12, 13 21 7 16, 18
11 250 Chang Liver FGA (18) loss 100 X 16 27, 28 12, 13 21 7 16, 18
12 233 J-111 D8 (13) loss 100 X 16 27, 28 12 18, 21 7 16, 18
13 236 HeLa.P3 D21 (28) loss 100 X 16 27 12, 13 18, 21 7 16, 18
14 242 HMV-1 D8 (13) loss vWF (19) gain 91 X 16 27, 28 12 18, 21 7 16, 18, 19
15 256 IMC-3 D8 (13) loss vWF (18 to 19) change 90 X 16 27, 28 12 18, 21 7 16, 19
16 223 HeLa S3 D21 (29) gain 82 X 16 27, 28, 29 12 18, 21 7 17, 18
D8 (13) loss
vWF (16 to 17) change

amg, amelogenin.