Skip to main content
. 2001 Jun 19;98(14):8012–8017. doi: 10.1073/pnas.121616198

Table 2.

STR profiles of T24 cell lines

Trial identification Reported name Comparison with consensus Percent match SGM profile results
amg D18S1179 D21S11 D8S1179 FGA TH01 vWF
Consensus profile
X 16,  18 29 14 17, 22 6 17
1 228 ECV304 Identical 100 X 16, 18 29 14 17, 22 6 17
2 222 EJ-1 (T24) Identical 100 X 16, 18 29 14 17, 22 6 17
3 9M MGH-U2 Identical 100 X 16, 18 29 14 17, 22 6 17
4 234 T24 Identical 100 X 16, 18 29 14 17, 22 6 17
5 5H HU456 FGA (17) loss 100 X 16, 18 29 14 22 6 17
6 10H HU961T FGA (17) loss 100 X 16, 18 29 14 22 6 17
7 18M MGH-U2 FGA (17) loss 100 X 16, 18 29 14 22 6 17
8 41 T24 vWF (19) gain  90 X 16, 18 29 14 17, 22 6 17, 19
9 7T T24 D8 (9) gain vWF (19) gain  82 X 16, 18 29 9, 14 17, 22 6 17, 19

amg, amelogenin.