Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 16.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2011 Aug 26;78(2):61–73. doi: 10.1002/arch.20440

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Alignment of dacapo protein sequences from Ae. albopictus, Ae. aegypti (XP_001651102.1), Culex quinquefasciatus (XP_001847162.1), D. melanogaster (gbAAB36557.1), Chymomyza costata (gbACT79565.1) and putative dacapo homologs from An. gambiae (XP_307826.3) and An. darlingi (AND_15659). The alignment was done with ClustalW (1.81) at the KEGG (Kyoto University Bioinformatics Center) website using the slow/ accurate method and the following parameters: Pairwise settings: Gap open penalty 35; gap extension penalty 0.3; Multiple alignment settings: gap open penalty 15; gap extension penalty 0.3 with weight transition and hydrophilic gaps off. Dots were substituted to represent identities to the Ae. albopictus sequence at top and dashes indicate gaps. Open boxes designate S/TXXE/D CD2 motifs. The shaded box indicates a PCNA binding domain.