Table 4.
Expected discovery rate (EDR) comparing 20 and 30 biological replicates.
| Phenotypic group comparisons | Sample size (n) | Sampling time-points (DPI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 7 | 11 | ||
| HvHg vs. LvHg | 20 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.37 |
| 30 | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.47 | |
| HvLg vs. LvLg | 20 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.96 |
| 30 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.98 | |
| HvHg vs. HvLg | 20 | 0.77 | 0.88 | NA |
| 30 | 0.86 | 0.94 | 0.45 | |
| LvHg vs. LvLg | 20 | 0.55 | 0.42 | 0.62 |
| 30 | 0.63 | 0.51 | 0.70 | |
All four contrasts were compared at each DPI and evaluated for future sampling with desirable power (>80%).
NA, not available. The algorithm could not reach a result.