Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 16;6:349. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00349

Table 3A.

Pictures. Brain activations associated with “Threatening” compared with “Harmless” behavioral judgments (see Figure 7).

Anatomical region BA x y z Z-value Extent
R lingual/paraH gyrus 19/30 18 −51 −3 5.03 109
R lingual gyrus 19 18 −59 −5 3.54
L lingual/paraH gyrus 19/30 −16 −47 −3 4.91 227
−8 −62 0 3.50
L post. cingulate gyrus 23/31 −12 −56 12 3.50
Lingual gyrus 19/18 4 −58 1 3.63 16
R posterior insula/TTG 41 38 −17 16 4.49 45
L superior temporal gyrus 22 −50 −24 16 4.07 38
L MidFG/frontal pole 10 −34 51 16 4.00 21
L mPFC/ACC 10 −8 43 14 3.97 17
L anterior cingulate cortex 32 −14 34 19 3.87 20
−22 36 15 3.18
Anterior cingulate cortex 32/24 0 47 0 3.39 14
L inferior frontal gyrus 44/45 −34 11 16 3.85 16
mPFC/frontal pole 10 −4 65 12 3.85 11
R MidFG/frontal pole 10 40 47 12 3.63 15
L precuneus 7 −16 −76 42 4.42 78
L posterior cingulate 31 −12 −33 31 4.19 13
R precuneus 7 12 −72 40 3.76 44
14 −62 42 3.60
12 −68 48 3.35
Cuneus 17/31 0 −71 11 3.44 10
Precuneus/post. cingulate 31/23 −2 −63 25 3.37 41
31/23 −2 −68 33 3.35
R IPL/angular g./TPJ 40/39 40 −62 38 3.71 25
34 −68 42 3.33
L MTG/angular g./TPJ 39 −34 −65 29 3.71 22
L IPL/angular g./TPJ 40/39 −51 −60 40 3.65 17
R hippocampus/ParaH g. 30/19 24 −39 −6 3.65 26
L superior temporal gyrus 22/42 −61 −26 16 3.59 15