Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2013 Jan;34(1):38–44. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31827ba22a

TABLE 3.

Risk of WLD (without RD)a Associated with S/LI According to Gender

n Number of WLD (without RD) Cases by Age 19 Years Cumulative Incidence of WLD (without RD) by Age 19 Years, % Unadjusted HRb (95% CI), P Adjusted HRc (95% CI), P
Both genders
 S/LI 294 24 9.1% 3.44 (2.24–5.27), <.01 2.74 (1.74–4.32), <.01
 Non-S/LI 5400 179 4.1% 1.00 1.00
Boys
 S/LI 196 16 9.2% 2.88 (1.70–4.87), <.01 2.30 (1.30–4.08), <.01
 Non-S/LI 2751 108 4.8% 1.00 1.00
Girls
 S/LI 98 8 8.9% 4.17 (2.00–8.68), <.01 3.81 (1.81–8.02), <.01
 Non-S/LI 2649 71 3.3% 1.00 1.00
a

Written Learning Disability and Reading Disability assessed by any of the 3 formulas (Regression Formula Minnesota, Discrepancy Formula, Low Achievement Formula).

b

P = .385 for gender*S/LI interaction.

c

Models for boys and girls separately have been adjusted for child’s race (white vs non-white), child’s birth weight, mother’s education level, and mother’s age. Model with both genders combined has been adjusted for sex, child’s race (white vs non-white), child’s birth weight, mother’s education level, and mother’s age. P = .253 for gender*S/LI interaction.