Table 2.
Effect of cultivar on TP content and antioxidant activity of mulberry leaves.
| Cultivar | TP (GAE mg/g DW) | FRAP (mmol TE/100 g DW) | HSA (%) | SSA (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Da 10 | 35.4 ± 4.7 a,b | 11.5 ± 2.2 | 60.11 ± 5.9 b | 44.1 ± 7.1 a,b |
| Kq 10 | 44.7 ± 10.7 b | 14.3 ± 1.5 | 72.8 ± 6.8 c | 58.3 ± 13.7 b |
| Ns 14 | 30.4 ± 6.3 a | 12.1 ± 1.6 | 50.9 ± 8.6 a | 38.0 ± 4.6 a |
| Yu 7803 | 40.2 ± 6.1 a,b | 13.4 ± 1.4 | 60.0 ± 9.3 b | 45.93 ± 9.5 a,b |
| Ys 10 | 43.0 ± 5.7 b | 12.1 ± 2.5 | 69.3 ± 7.8 c | 42.2 ± 7.7 a |
| Bd 2 | 44.5 ± 8.0 b | 13.8 ± 1.8 | 69.7 ± 3.3 c | 53.1 ± 11.4 a,b |
The experimental results were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey-Kramer HSD. Values (mean ± SD, n = 7) with no letters in common are significantly different (p < 0.05) within a column.