Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 10;8:19–27. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S36514

Table 2.

Executive function measures (mean ± SD) at T1, T2, and T3

Adjacency
T1 31.3 ± 13.2
T2 27.5 ± 14.2a
T3 22.1 ± 12.1b
F1,37 = 13.44; P = 0.000; ηp2 = 0.27; 1–β = 1.0
Turning point index
T1 86.9 ± 16.1
T2 89.0 ± 17.6
T3 94.8 ± 12.7b
F1,37 = 8.41; P = 0.001; ηp2 = 0.19; 1–β = 0.96
Runs
T1 1.1 ± 0.8
T2 1.2 ± 0.8
T3 0.9 ± 0.3b
F1,37 = 4.68; P = 0.012; ηp2 = 0.11; 1–β = 0.77 F1,37 = 2.93; P = 0.060; ηp2 = 0.07; 1–β = 0.55
ΔTrail making
T1 44.1 ± 29.7
T2 31.2 ± 23.9a
T3 36.3 ± 25.2
F1,40 = 4.06; P = 0.021; ηp2 = 0.096; 1–β = 0.71

Notes: Analysis of variance and post hoc results are also reported. Data are collapsed across groups (n = 42);

main effect for time;

time*training interaction;

a

significantly different from T1;

b

significantly different from T2 at P < 0.025 (Bonferroni correction).

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; T1, baseline; T2, control; T3, following training; ηp2, partial eta squared.