Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 16;8(1):e54251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054251

Table 1. Patient characteristics for the groups with Gleason score ≤7 or >7 and differences in HIF1α expression between the groups.

HIF1α positive HIF1α negative
Gleason score ≤7 Gleason score >7 Gleason score ≤7 Gleason score >7
Number of patients 29 54 9 8
Mean age (years) 59.9 70.7 62.2 68.1
Tumor Stage (T1–T2) 23 9 8 3
Tumor Stage (T3–T4¥) 6 29 1 4
Median pre-interventional PSA* 6.4 (1.4 – 43) 14 (0.7 – 483.7) 5.4 (4 – 10.2) 14.8 (2 – 40.2)
Median follow-up from diagnosisin years 2.3 3.6 2.4 3.3
Patients started on androgendeprivation therapy¥ 0 38 0 5

The group with Gleason score ≤7 was comprised of Gleason score <6 (6), 6 (28) and 7 (4) and the group with Gleason score >7 was comprised of scores 8 (8), 9 (52) and 10 (2).

There were 17 patients with missing data for tumor stage in the group with Gleason score >7 and 16 of these patients were HIF1α positive.

¥

There was no significant association with HIF1α expression and Gleason scores when analyzed using Pearson’s Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test using two-by-two tables.

*

Pre-interventional PSA was defined as PSA immediately prior to obtaining the tissue sample.