Table 1. Patient characteristics for the groups with Gleason score ≤7 or >7 and differences in HIF1α expression between the groups.
HIF1α positive | HIF1α negative | |||
Gleason score ≤7 | Gleason score >7 | Gleason score ≤7 | Gleason score >7 | |
Number of patients | 29 | 54 | 9 | 8 |
Mean age (years) | 59.9 | 70.7 | 62.2 | 68.1 |
Tumor Stage (T1–T2) | 23 | 9† | 8 | 3† |
Tumor Stage (T3–T4¥) | 6 | 29† | 1 | 4† |
Median pre-interventional PSA* | 6.4 (1.4 – 43) | 14 (0.7 – 483.7) | 5.4 (4 – 10.2) | 14.8 (2 – 40.2) |
Median follow-up from diagnosisin years | 2.3 | 3.6 | 2.4 | 3.3 |
Patients started on androgendeprivation therapy¥ | 0 | 38 | 0 | 5 |
The group with Gleason score ≤7 was comprised of Gleason score <6 (6), 6 (28) and 7 (4) and the group with Gleason score >7 was comprised of scores 8 (8), 9 (52) and 10 (2).
There were 17 patients with missing data for tumor stage in the group with Gleason score >7 and 16 of these patients were HIF1α positive.
There was no significant association with HIF1α expression and Gleason scores when analyzed using Pearson’s Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test using two-by-two tables.
Pre-interventional PSA was defined as PSA immediately prior to obtaining the tissue sample.