Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 16;8(1):e54596. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054596

Table 3. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors identified in our study with DFS as the end point in patients with NSCLC.

Prognostic factor HR1 95% CI2 P-value3
pTNM stage
I vs. II+III 0.095 0.030–0.303 <0.001
miR-155-5p
Low vs. high 0.060 0.005–0.767 0.030
miR-223-3p
Low vs. high 1.449 0.581–3.614 0.426
miR-20a-5p
Low vs. high 2.881 1.009–8.227 0.048
miR-152-3p
High vs. low 0.333 0.125–0.892 0.029
miR-126-3p
High vs. low 0.497 0.191–1.295 0.153
miR-199a-5p
High vs. low 0.204 0.045–0.918 0.038
1

HR; hazard ratio.–2CI; confidence interval. 3 P-value<0.05 statistically significant.