Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Youth Adolesc. 2012 Sep 22;42(3):363–375. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9823-2

Table 3.

Hierarchical regression analyses of homophobic name-calling on psychological distress

b (SE) β P
Step 1
  Negative peer treatment .31 (.04) .33 <.001
  Gendera .12 (.06) .09   .042
  R2 .11 <.001
Step 2
  Negative peer treatment .25 (.04) .27 <.001
  Gendera .17 (.06) .13   .005
  Homophobic name-calling .14 (.04) .17   .001
  R2 .13 <.001
  ΔR2 .02   .001
Step 3
  Negative peer treatment .19 (.04) .21 <.001
  Gendera .07 (.06) .05   .259
  Homophobic name-calling .08 (.04) .09   .070
  Same-sex attractionb .21 (.09) .10   .027
  Gender non-conformity .18 (.03) .26 <.001
  R2 .20 <.001
  ΔR2 .07 <.001
Step 4
  Negative peer treatment .20 (.04) .21 <.001
  Gendera .08 (.06) .06   .182
  Homophobic name-calling .03 (.06) .04   .623
  Same-sex attractionb .18 (.10) .08   .069
  Gender non-conformity .15 (.04) .22 <.001
  Gender × homophobic name-calling .01 (.09) .00   .939
  Same-sex attraction × homophobic name-calling .09 (.09) .06   .294
  Gender non-conformity × homophobic name-calling .03 (.02) .08   .115
  R2 .20 <.001
  ΔR2 .01   .226
a

Male adolescents = 0, Female adolescents = 1

b

Not same-sex attracted = 0, Same-sex attracted = 1