Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013 Jan;113(1):127–132. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.08.021

Table 3.

Adjusted dietary intake and behaviors of young adults by attitudes toward alternative food production practices (Student Health and Wellness Study, n=1,201)a,b

n Low Importancec Moderate Importance High Importance P-valued
Dietary Intake
Fruits and vegetables (servings)e,f 1,117 3.1x 3.7y 4.4z <0.001
Fruit (cups)f 1,145 0.8x 1.0y 1.3z <0.001
Vegetables (cups)e,f 1,124 1.0x 1.1y 1.2z <0.001
Dietary fiber (g)f 1,071 13.1x 14.5y 16.3z <0.001
Added sugars (tsp)f 1,127 15.6x 14.7x 13.0y <0.001
Percent calories from fat 1,153 30.1 29.5 29.1 0.025
Dairy (servings)f 1,147 1.3 1.3 1.3 0.755
Calcium (mg)f 1,013 691 715 692 0.477
Dietary Behaviors
Eats breakfast (days/week) 1,161 3.8x 4.3y 4.7y <0.001
Fast food (times/week)g 1,154 1.1x 1.0x 0.5y <0.001
Sugar-sweetened beverages (drinks/day)g 1,158 0.9x 0.9x 0.6y 0.001
a

Sample sizes vary due missing data.

b

Means adjusted for gender, age, race/ethnicity, student type (2-year or 4-year), type of residence, parent educational attainment, difficulty living on household income, receipt of public assistance, and vegetarian status.

c

Sum of responses to the importance of food being organically grown, made with organic ingredients, not processed, locally grown, and grown using sustainable agricultural practices between 0–5 was classified as low importance, between 6–10 as moderate importance, and between 11–15 as high importance.

d

P-values from F tests.

e

Excludes French fries.

f

Analysis conducted on natural log scale.

g

Analysis conducted on square root scale.

x,y,z

Values with unlike superscript letters (x, y, z) statistically different at P<0.05 with a Bonferroni correction for three pairwise tests (P<0.0167).