TABLE 2.

A/EA v. SFH/NMH comparisons. Logistic discriminant function coefficients and intercepts for nine equations, along with each equation’s success rates for within sample and test group applications. A result >0 indicates AA/EA affiliation.

equation	LM1PS	UCSS	UI2DS	UM2MC	LI1SS	LM1AF	LI2SS	UI2SS	UM1MC	UM1HC	intercept	std error	AA/EA		sample NMH/SFH		combined		AA/EA		test NMH/SFH		combined
													n	correct	n	correct	n	correct	n	correct	n	correct	n	correct
1	−2.284	−1.084	−3.274	−1.406	−1.222	−1.929	−0.130	0.020	−1.528	−2.842	5.670	7.122	171	0.918	166	0.916	337	0.917	15	0.867	9	0.889	24	0.875
2		−1.470	−3.365	−1.399	−1.518	−2.047	−0.031	0.112	−1.784	−2.642	5.589	6.064	179	0.899	170	0.924	349	0.911	16	0.875	10	0.900	26	0.885
3			−3.495	−1.338	−1.405	−2.080	−0.349	−0.399	−1.738	−2.477	5.290	4.945	182	0.901	190	0.911	372	0.906	17	0.824	11	1.000	28	0.893
4				−1.404	−1.384	−2.111	−0.432	−3.586	−1.773	−2.505	5.234	4.472	182	0.901	193	0.922	375	0.912	17	0.647	11	1.000	28	0.786
5					−0.971	−2.206	−0.540	−3.158	−2.379	−2.451	5.013	3.558	194	0.923	222	0.878	416	0.899	17	0.706	12	1.000	29	0.828
6						−2.049	−1.369	−2.930	−2.474	−2.374	4.912	2.677	198	0.934	223	0.870	421	0.900	17	0.706	14	1.000	31	0.839
7							−1.754	−2.819	−2.526	−2.280	4.291	1.876	228	0.838	248	0.895	476	0.868	18	0.611	16	1.000	34	0.794
8								−3.261	−2.430	−2.466	3.661	1.429	229	0.856	252	0.881	481	0.869	18	0.667	16	0.938	34	0.794
9									−2.395	−2.247	2.686	0.794	232	0.866	262	0.733	494	0.796	20	0.750	19	0.579	39	0.667