Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 2;9(1):130–144. doi: 10.1007/s11306-012-0432-6

Table 2.

Pearson correlation of volatile and semi-polar metabolites with total capsaicinoid levels in pericarp, placenta and seeds and with the capsaicin analogue detected by LCMS

Type Ret(min) Mass RI Putative identity HCA cluster Correlation to capsaicin pericarp Correlation to capsaicinseed and placenta Correlation to capsaicin analog LCMS
Volatile 38.7 55 1657.5 9-Tetradecenal, (Z)- A 0.90 0.53 0.88
27.3 70 1253.7 Heptyl isobutanoate A 0.86 0.41 0.82
29.9 82 1332.7 Hexanoic acid, 3-hexenyl ester, (Z)- A 0.85 0.57 0.79
25.0 71 1187.3 Butanoic acid, hexyl ester A 0.84 0.59 0.83
23.8 56 1153.4 Hexyl 2-methylpropanoate A 0.82 0.66 0.82
38.8 41 1664 Oxacyclotetradecan-2-one A 0.81 0.71 0.81
21.7 71 1093.6 Butanoic acid, pentyl ester A 0.81 0.36 0.79
38.8 55 1662 Oxacyclotetradecan-2-one A 0.80 0.72 0.81
24.9 67 1183 cis-3-Hexenyl Butyrate A 0.79 0.36 0.75
23.3 103 1138 Pentyl 2-methylbutanoate A 0.79 0.73 0.81
27.0 56 1244.7 Hexyl n-valerate A 0.78 0.70 0.78
20.2 43 1051.4 Pentylisobutyrate A 0.78 0.59 0.81
28.1 56 1278.6 Hexyl n-valerate A 0.78 0.58 0.78
22.0 70 1101.7 Isopentyl 2-methylbutanoate A 0.78 0.71 0.79
16.7 43 956.08 3-Heptanone, 5-methyl- A 0.77 0.29 0.67
23.7 68 1148.3 3-Methyl-3-butenyl 3-methylbutanoate A 0.76 0.71 0.79
39.4 43 1683.6 13-Tetradecanolide A 0.76 0.63 0.77
23.7 70 1150.6 iso-Amyl isovalerate A 0.75 0.58 0.75
33.8 55 1466.5 1-Pentadecene A 0.74 0.69 0.78
35.6 56 1530.8 1-Tridecanol A 0.74 0.66 0.74
33.8 43 1468.2 n-Heptyl hexanoate A 0.73 0.65 0.76
18.8 43 1014.9 3-Methyl-1-butanol, 2-methylpropanoate A 0.71 0.60 0.72
38.5 43 1647.5 Hexadecane, 2-methyl- A 0.70 0.47 0.68
30.0 117 1337.7 4-methylpentyl 4-methylpentanoate A 0.69 0.72 0.71
28.0 82 1273.4 3-Hexen-1-ol valerate, (Z)- A 0.69 0.47 0.61
25.8 70 1209.7 Pentanoic acid, 4-methyl-, pentyl ester A 0.68 0.66 0.66
23.6 43 1145.6 Hexyl 2-methylpropanoate A 0.67 0.71 0.70
23.4 43 1141.7 n-Amyl isovalerate A 0.66 0.76 0.70
22.4 43 1111.8 Hexyl 2-methylpropanoate A 0.65 0.73 0.68
32.8 69 1430.7 alpha-Ionone A 0.64 0.71 0.68
22.1 70 1106.3 Butanoic acid, 3-methyl-, 3-methylbutyl ester A 0.63 0.72 0.63
20.4 43 1057.5 Pentyl 2-methylpropanoate A 0.62 0.73 0.68
25.4 56 1196.7 4-methylpentyl 3-methylbutanoate A 0.61 0.76 0.64
35.6 71 1531.7 gamma-Macrocarpene, (E)- A 0.60 0.78 0.64
12.2 56 829.52 1-Pentanol, 4-methyl- A 0.60 0.86 0.64
26.9 70 1242.4 Isopentyl hexanoate A 0.59 0.38 0.60
28.9 70 1301 4-Methyl-1-hexanol 2-methylbutanoate A 0.58 0.76 0.60
34.8 91 1499.6 gamma-Humulene A 0.58 0.69 0.65
25.9 69 1212.1 à-Citronellol A 0.57 0.75 0.62
34.8 93 1502.9 gamma-Humulene A 0.56 0.67 0.63
31.0 43 1368.9 alpha-Longipinene A 0.53 0.65 0.59
31.7 91 1392 Benzyl 3-methylbutanoate A 0.51 0.75 0.51
26.5 67 1230.6 Hexyl 2-methylbutanoate A 0.48 0.68 0.52
26.8 43 1238.1 Heptyl isobutanoate A 0.48 0.50 0.52
34.5 177 1490.7 beta-Ionone A 0.47 0.64 0.51
26.7 56 1234.2 Hexyl 3-methylbutanoate A 0.47 0.68 0.51
29.1 73 1308.8 Nonanoic acid A 0.46 0.72 0.50
31.3 82 1380 Hexenyl (3Z)-hexenoate, (3Z)- A 0.45 0.56 0.48
13.4 56 863.91 1-Hexanol A 0.44 0.75 0.47
Semi-polar metabolites 39.5 318.17 capsaicin/capsaicin analogue B 0.98 0.55 1.00
17.9 395.19 Hexanol–pentose–hexose B 0.87 0.33 0.87
21.6 665.17 Chrysoeriol diglucose B 0.76 0.28 0.66
19.2 651.16 Luteolin-O-acetyl-diglucose B 0.73 0.27 0.63
13.9 903.24 Quercetin-dihexose-deoxyhexose-pentose B 0.65 0.29 0.62
12.6 447.15 Benzyl alcohol-hexose-pentose + FA B 0.63 0.21 0.67
18.4 725.19 3,4′,5,7-Tetrahydroxyflavone; 3-O-[Rhamnosyl-(1->?)-galactoside], 7-O-arabinoside B 0.58 0.22 0.56
13.3 337.09 Coumaroylquinic acid B 0.57 0.12 0.60
16.0 425.2 1-Hexanol; O-[?-d-Glucopyranosyl-(1?2)-?-d-glucopyranoside] B 0.53 0.14 0.59

Ret retention time (minutes), Mass nominal mass (in case of volatiles) or exact mass (in case of semi-polar metabolites), RI retention index, HCA cluster refers to the cluster in the HCA for volatiles (Fig. 3) or semi-polar metabolites (Fig. 4). Only metabolites with a putative identity are shown. Total capsaicinoids used in the correlation analysis was measured previously (Wahyuni et al. 2011)