Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 20;120(12):1671–1677. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1104789

Table 2.

Mean raw scores for nine outcome variables at three conditions of CO2 concentration among 22 participants, and comparison using MANOVA.

Outcome variables Conditions (ppm of CO2) (mean ± SD) Overall F-statistic (df = 2,42) p-Value
600 ppm 1,000 ppm 2,500 ppm
Basic activity 69.59 ± 7.04 59.23 ± 7.12 38.77 ± 7.57 172.77 < 0.001
Applied activity 117.86 ± 39.28 97.55 ± 35.51 62.68 ± 31.86 72.13 < 0.001
Focused activity 16.27 ± 3.20 16.09 ± 3.70 19.55 ± 3.40 17.26 < 0.001
Task orientation 140.82 ± 28.66 125.41 ± 28.62 50.45 ± 31.66 115.08 < 0.001
Initiative 20.09 ± 6.96 16.45 ± 6.70 1.41 ± 1.26 81.45 < 0.001
Information search 20.36 ± 3.06 21.5 ± 3.20 20.91 ± 3.08 2.51 > 0.10
Information usage 10.32 ± 3.21 7.95 ± 2.24 3.18 ± 1.71 129.20 < 0.001
Breadth of approach 9.36 ± 1.36 7.82 ± 1.56 2.32 ± 1.17 679.88 < 0.001
Basic strategy 27.23 ± 5.48 23.95 ± 5.65 1.68 ± 1.32 414.51 < 0.001
df, degrees of freedom.