Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 11;120(12):1650–1657. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1205432

Table 1.

Calculated HSAB and experimental parameters for conjugated type-2 alkenes and ­nonconjugated analogs.

Type-2 alkene σ (× 10–3/eV)a ω (eV) log k2b Uptake (log IC50)c
Acrolein 379 3.57 2.596 –4.28
NEM 406 4.73 6.536 –4.33
MVK 382 3.18 2.048 –3.48
HNE 393 3.78 0.938 –3.40
Crotonaldehyde 385 3.38 ND ND
MA 315 2.76 –1.893 –0.34
ACR 346 2.62 –1.804 –0.36
EMA 322 2.68 ND ND
Nonconjugatedd
Propanal 323 2.26
Allyl alcohol 276 1.63
Abbreviations: EMA, ethyl methacrylate; MA, methyl acrylate; MVK, methylvinyl ketone; ND, not determined. aFor each compound, respective lowest and highest occupied molecular orbital energies (ELUMO and EHOMO, respectively) were obtained from ground state equilibrium geometries with density functional theory calculations DFT B3LYP-6-31G* in vacuum from 6-31G* initial geometries and were used to calculate softness (σ) and the electrophilic index (ω) as described by LoPachin et al. (2012). bSecond-order reaction rates (k2) were determined for type-2 alkene reactions with l-cysteine at pH 7.4. cInhibition of synaptosomal membrane tritiated dopamine [(3H)-DA] uptake was determined in striatal synaptosomes exposed to type-2 alkenes (LoPachin et al. 2007a, 2007b). dDo not undergo the Michael reaction.