Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 18.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Manag Care. 2011 Nov;17(11):e443–e448.

Table 1.

Multivariable predictors of retail clinic use 2007-20091

Predictor Marginal
Effect 2
95% Confdence
Interval
Sex
 Female 0.9% 0.84% to 0.98%
 Male REF
Age category
 <18 −2.7% −2.9% to −2.6%
 18-44 REF
 45-64 −1.6% −1.7% to −1.5%
Distance from home ZIP code to retail clinic
 ≤1 mile 7.5% 6.6% to 8.4%
 >1 to ≤5 miles 5.1% 4.3% to 5.9%
 >5 to ≤10 miles 3.8% 2.8% to 4.7%
 >10 to ≤20 miles REF
Income 3
 Low Income (<2X FPL) REF
 Middle Income (2X FPL to $59,000) 1.1% 0.7% to 1.5%
 High Income (> $59,000) 2.6% 2.1% to 3.1%
Health Status
 No chronic conditions REF
 1 Chronic condition −0.2% −0.3% to −0.1%
 2+ Chronic conditions −0.9% −1.0% to −0.8%
Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) 4
 Enrollee lives in HPSA (ZIP code) 0.0% −0.4% to 0.4%
 Enrollee does not live in HPSA (ZIP code) REF
Year
 Year = 2007 REF
 Year = 2008 5.8% 5.5% to 6.1%
 Year = 2009 7.9% 7.5% to 8.3%
1

Logistic model included fixed effects for insurance market areas (not included here). Standard errors clustered by ZIP code.

2

Increase in probability of retail clinic use associated. Estimated for average enrollee in the analysis population. All are significantly different from 0 at the 0.05 level except the HPSA indicator.

3

Median household income for ZIP code tabulation area. FPL = Federal poverty level.

4

Majority of population in ZIP code tabulation area lives in primary care health professional shortage area as defined by the Health Resources and Services Administration.