Table 4. Correlation analyses (r; Spearman tests) evaluating the effect of nutritional status and eating disorders on spatial cognition.

	Subjective vertical						Z-axis
	Visual condition			Tactile condition			Visual condition			Tactile condition
	Upright	CW	CCW	Upright	CW	CCW	Upright	CW	CCW	Upright	CW	CCW
Weight
Total sample	−0.209	−0.609 a	−0.564 a	−0.122	−0.556 a	−0.449 b	−0.222	−0.508 a	−0.309 c	−0.109	−0.515 a	−0.343 c
AN group	−0.446 c	−0.37 d	−0.06	0.408 c	−0.028	−0.032	−0.411 c	−0.35 d	−0.137	0.323	−0.226	−0.181
Control group	−0.232	−0.189	−0.329	−0.328	0.478 c	−0.255	0.191	−0.139	0.199	−0.409 d	−0.135	−0.182
EDI 2 total score
Total sample	0.179	0.568 a	0.325 c	0.095	0.472 b	0.488 a	0.138	0.44 b	0.312 c	0.059	0.418 b	0.359 c
AN group	0.095	0.183	0.116	0.279	0.065	0.066	0.096	0.09	0.179	0.279	0.006	0.247
Control group	0.042	0.144	0.017	0.072	0.056	0.329	0.116	0.129	0.264	0.024	0.07	0.06
EDI 2 IA
Total sample	0.336 c	0.593 a	0.419 b	0.078	0.47 b	0.413 b	0.326 c	0.526 a	0.339 c	0.067	0.426 b	0.315 c
AN group	0.402 d	0.16	0.122	0.208	0.137	0.141	0.402	0.02	0.049	0.28	0.294	0.091
Control group	0.178	0.346	0.423 c	0.113	0.169	0.244	0.198	0.258	0.352 d	0.147	0.285	0.138

Significant differences (Spearman tests; two-tailed) are indicated: ^a p<0.001; ^b p<0.01; ^c p<0.05; ^d p < 0.1. CW: clockwise body tilted; CCW: counter-clockwise body tilted.