Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 18;8(1):e53980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053980

Table 2. Numbers of USC clones in different preservation solutions of urine.

Groups Gross success rate of generating USC clone (%) Numbers of cell clones/100 ml urine Total clones/100 ml
USC clones Differentiating cells
G1. Fresh urine (control)(24 hours storage, n = 30) (83%) 25/30 urine samples 6.29±4.6 1.39±1.47 7.62±5.86
G2. HTK solution(24 hours storage, n = 30) 2.07±1.42 0.85±0.54 2.68±1.93
G3. UW solution(24 hours storage, n = 30) 0 0 0
G4. USC culture medium (0.5% FBS) (24 hours storage, n = 30) (70%) 21/30 urine samples 3.16±1.95 0.98±0.72 3.91±2.50
G5. USC culture medium (10% FBS) (24 hours storage, n = 30) (73%) 22/30 urine samples 3.37±1.29 0.73±0.32 4.04±1.55
G6. USC culture medium (serum free) (24 hours storage, n = 30) 1.08±0.5 1.01±0.48 2.09±0.75
G7. 0.5% FBS(24 hours storage, n = 30) 1.19±0.36 0.69±0.29 1.86±0.57
G8. USC culture medium (0.5% FBS) (12 hours storage, n = 9) 4.15±1.21 1.29±0.42 5.44±1.39
G9. No preservation (control) 0 0 0