Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan;133(1):283–300. doi: 10.1121/1.4770245

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Comparison ΔHf,g (left) and ΔIf, (right) for data acquired in a pre-cancer model (Ref. 7) like that shown in Fig. 7. While analysis at all thresholds between 0% and 100% was undertaken, we wish to focus attention on the results obtained between 75% and 100% (results from lower analysis thresholds have been “dimmed” by a translucent overlay). In both cases, a broad region of confidence values above 2 is shown. While the extent of this region is larger in the ΔIf, confidence panel, the maximum height of the ΔHf,g confidence panel is more than twice as high (16.0 vs 6.8). A color-to-confidence calibration bar is shown to the right of the confidence panels.