. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.

Published in final edited form as: Eur J Nutr. 2012 Aug 23;52(3):1251–1260. doi: 10.1007/s00394-012-0436-z

Table 4.

Energy- and multivariate-adjusted^a odds ratios (OR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for fish intake and risk of endometrial cancer

Total fish, servings/week^b	0–<0.46	0.46–<1.04	1.04–<2.00	≥2.00	P_trend	Continuous
N (cases/controls)	147/127	147/136	147/131	115/139
Energy- and age–adjusted OR	Ref.	0.93 (0.66–1.30)	0.95 (0.67–1.33)	0.68 (0.48–0.97)	0.050	0.92 (0.86–1.02)
Multivariate-adjusted^a OR	Ref.	1.05 (0.73–1.52)	1.00 (0.69–1.45)	0.74 (0.50–1.10)	0.142	0.93 (0.86–1.02)

	White Fish		Dark fish		Shell fish		Fried fish
	N (cases/controls)	OR (95 % CI)^a	N (cases/controls)	OR (95 % CI)^a	N (cases/controls)	OR (95 % CI)^a	N (cases/controls)	OR (95 % CI)^a
Never	189/153	Ref.	293/236	Ref.	278/251	Ref.	319/345	Ref.
Ever	367/380	0.88 (0.66–1.17)	263/297	0.82 (0.63–1.07)	278/282	0.91 (0.70–1.18)	237/188	1.26 (0.96–1.66)

Multivariate models were adjusted for energy consumption (continuous), age (continuous), body mass index (continuous), number of live births (continuous), menopausal status (pre/post), oral contraceptive use (ever/never), hypertension (yes/no), smoking status (never/former/current), and race/ethnicity

Quartiles were divided based on quartiles of intake among controls