Skip to main content
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America logoLink to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
. 2012 Dec 17;110(3):1137. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220649110

Correction for Fang et al., Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications

PMCID: PMC3549137

MEDICAL SCIENCES Correction for “Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications,” by Ferric C. Fang, R. Grant Steen, and Arturo Casadevall, which appeared in issue 42, October 16, 2012, of Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (109:17028–17033; first published October 1, 2012; 10.1073/pnas.1212247109).

The authors note that Table 3 appeared incorrectly. The corrected table appears below.

Table 3.

Most Cited Retracted Articles

First author Journal Year published Year retracted Times cited* Reason for retraction
Wakefield Lancet 1998 2004; 2010 758 Fraud
Reyes Blood 2001 2009 740 Error
Fukuhara Science 2005 2007 686 Error
Nakao Lancet 2003 2009 626 Fraud
Chang Science 2001 2006 512 Error
Kugler Nature Medicine 2000 2003 494 Fraud
Rubio Cancer Research 2005 2010 457 Error
Gowen Science 1998 2003 395 Fraud
Makarova Nature 2001 2006 375 Error
Hwang Science 2004 2006 368 Fraud
Potti The New England Journal of Medicine 2006 2011 361 Fraud
Brugger The New England Journal of Medicine 1995 2001 336 Fraud
Van Parijs Immunity 1999 2009 330 Fraud
Potti Nature Medicine 2006 2011 328 Fraud
Schön Science 2000 2002 297 Fraud
Chiu Nature 2005 2010 281 Error
Cooper Science 1997 2005 264 Fraud
Le Page Cell 2000 2005 262 Error
Kawasaki Nature 2004 2006 243 Fraud
Hwang Science 2005 2006 234 Fraud

*As of June 22, 2012


Articles from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America are provided here courtesy of National Academy of Sciences

RESOURCES