Table 4.
Summary of findings
| Experiment | Groups compared† | p-value‡ | Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC) | PCC result or group with greater mean, if significant |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unadjusted eye size |
M vs. F |
<0.001*** |
|
M |
| WS vs. DS |
<0.001*** |
|
WS |
|
|
Forewing area |
M vs. F |
<0.001*** |
|
F |
| WS vs. DS |
<0.001*** |
|
DS |
|
|
Adjusted eye size (corrected with forewing area) |
M vs. F |
<0.001*** |
|
M |
| WS vs. DS |
<0.001*** |
|
WS |
|
|
Correlation between eye size and wing size |
WSM |
0.001** |
r=0.658 |
Linear relationship |
| WSF |
0.002** |
r=0.588 |
Linear relationship |
|
| DSM |
0.149 |
r=0.253 |
|
|
| DSF |
0.006** |
r=0.523 |
Linear relationship |
|
| Both sexes, both seasons |
<0.001*** |
r=−0.354 |
Linear relationship |
|
|
Facet lens area |
M vs. F |
<0.001*** |
|
M |
| WS vs. DS |
0.031* |
|
DS |
|
|
Facet number |
WSM |
0.937 |
r=−0.031 |
|
| WSF |
0.862 |
r=0.063 |
|
|
| DSM |
0.472 |
r=−0.176 |
|
|
| DSF |
0.536 |
r=0.223 |
|
|
| Both sexes, both seasons |
0.250 |
r=0.169 |
|
|
| M vs. F |
<0.001*** |
|
M |
|
| WS vs. DS |
<0.001*** |
|
WS |
|
|
UV opsin expression |
DSM vs. DSF |
0.051 |
|
DSM (not significant) |
| WSM vs. WSF |
0.111 |
|
|
|
| DSM vs. WSM |
0.799 |
|
|
|
| DSF vs. WSF |
0.010* |
|
WSF |
|
|
Blue opsin expression |
DSM vs. DSF |
0.006** |
|
DSM |
| WSM vs. WSF |
0.333 |
|
|
|
| DSM vs. WSM |
0.757 |
|
|
|
| DSF vs. WSF |
0.007** |
|
WSF |
|
|
LW opsin expression |
DSM vs. DSF |
0.005** |
|
DSM |
| WSM vs. WSF |
0.454 |
|
|
|
| DSM vs. WSM |
0.329 |
|
|
|
| DSF vs. WSF | 0.007** | WSF |
† M, male; F, female; DS, dry season; WS, wet season; DSM, dry season male; WSM, wet season male; etc. ‡ Not significant, p>0.05; *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001.