Type of standard |
Internal |
External |
External |
Need for genetic modification |
No |
Yes |
No |
Need for delivery, loading, or labeling |
No |
Yes, by transfection or use of transgenic mice expressing GFP. |
Yes, in most cases, dyes have to be delivered to neurons. |
Delivery/loading/labeling methods |
N/A |
Biological (viral vector), chemical (e.g., cell-penetrating peptides, α-toxin of S. aureus), vehicle (e.g., liposomes), mechanical (e.g., microinjection, whole-cell patch clamping, gene gun), electrical (electroporation) |
Chemical (e.g., cell-penetrating peptides, α-toxin of S. aureus), vehicle (e.g., liposomes), mechanical (e.g., microinjection, whole-cell patch clamping, gene gun), electrical (electroporation) |
Effects on neurons |
N/A |
Protein delivery methods may alter the physiology of neurons or cause toxicity. Chromosomal insertion by viral vectors may disrupt gene expression. |
Loading/labeling neurons may alter the physiology or cause toxicity. The dyes themselves may be toxic to cells. |
Distribution pattern |
Similar to physiological distribution. |
Distribution pattern may be uneven in a single neuron (e.g., puncta-like pattern, Ref. 38 and Ma, B., unpublished results). The distal-most part or fine structure may not be labeled. The pattern may be variable between cells due to different levels of protein expression (38,39). |
The standards have to be anterogradely or retrogradely transported in neurons. In some cases, distribution pattern may be uneven in a single neuron (e.g., puncta-like pattern, Ref. 40). The distal-most part or fine structure may not be labeled. The pattern may be variable between cells due to different amounts of dye delivered (37). |
Efficiency of delivery, loading, or labeling methods |
N/A |
Transfection efficiency may be low because primary neurons are difficult to transfect especially in older neuronal cultures. |
Loading efficiency is variable. Depends on delivery methods. |
Aldehyde-fixable |
Yes |
Yes, but some fluorescent proteins may become lost after fixation because GFP is highly water soluble and diffusable. |
Yes, but only for specially treated dyes, e.g., lysinated dextrans. |
Loss of fluorescence after immunofluorescent staining |
No loss |
Some fluorescent proteins are highly water soluble and may be lost after staining. |
Fluorescent dyes may be washed out after staining. Lysinated dextrans are better. |
Loss of fluorescence after FISH |
No loss |
Some fluorescent proteins are highly water soluble and might be lost after harsh treatment used in FISH. |
Fluorescent dyes may be washed out after harsh treatment used in FISH. Lysinated dextrans are better. |
Detection methods |
Antibody staining |
Fluorescence from fluorescent protein itself or antibody against fluorescent protein (in the case of GFP loss, see Ref. 38). |
Fluorescence from conjugated fluorescent dye or antibody against the conjugated fluorescent dye or hapten. |
Whole-cell analysis |
Possible |
Not possible |
Not possible |
Cell segment analysis |
Possible |
Possible |
Possible |
Live cell imaging and analysis |
No. However, it is possible with Tubulin Tracker. |
Possible |
Possible |
Prior tests before application |
Need to test for constant expression in some cases (35), although it is a house-keeping gene. |
Might be needed as GFP expression in different cells might be variable. |
Might be needed as the amount and distribution of dyes loaded into different cells might be variable. |
Accuracy |
+++ |
+++ |
+++ |