Table 2.
Numbers of putative SNPs
| Bear River | Bonneville | Coastal | Colorado River | Greenback | Lahontan Basin | Rio Grande | Westslope | Yellowstone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bear River |
– |
2279 |
482 |
2170 |
2430 |
5459 |
1807 |
3600 |
941 |
| Bonneville |
280 |
– |
393 |
1182 |
1368 |
3528 |
1118 |
2268 |
1476 |
| Coastal |
50 |
63 |
– |
314 |
479 |
407 |
242 |
228 |
302 |
| Colorado River |
270 |
148 |
35 |
– |
1127 |
2775 |
969 |
1679 |
1225 |
| Greenback |
294 |
131 |
94 |
99 |
– |
3604 |
1125 |
2578 |
1603 |
| Lahontan Basin |
854 |
428 |
74 |
358 |
499 |
– |
2258 |
2722 |
3277 |
| Rio Grande |
273 |
91 |
24 |
64 |
63 |
235 |
– |
1401 |
1141 |
| Westslope |
539 |
243 |
50 |
274 |
227 |
301 |
152 |
– |
1930 |
| Yellowstone | 110 | 129 | 56 | 110 | 197 | 419 | 130 | 200 | – |
Pairwise comparisons of putative SNP loci among cutthroat trout subspecies discovered by 454 pyro-sequencing, Comparisons are shown for 6X coverage (above diagonal), and for 10X coverage (below diagonal).