Table 2. Progenic sex ratios and sex ratio status of F1 females of C. undecimpunctata of 2004 Egyptian sample (A-G), 2005 Egyptian sample (E1–E4) and Jordanian sample (J1–J5) lines.
Line | H | G | Y | Hatch rate | Progeny | Fisher’s exact test | Sex ratio status | ||
♀ | ♂ | Sex ratio | |||||||
A | 42 | 6 | 72 | 0.35 | 20 | 0 | 0 | F = 14.4, d.f. = 1, p<0.001 | SR |
B | 21 | 0 | 31 | 0.40 | 4 | 0 | 0 | F = 2.22, d.f. = 1, p = 0.214 | SR |
D | 82 | 2 | 38 | 0.67 | 25 | 16 | 0.39 | F = 0.98, d.f. = 1, p = 0.374 | N |
E | 90 | 4 | 47 | 0.64 | 34 | 21 | 0.38 | F = 1.533, d.f. = 1, p = 0.250 | N |
F | 67 | 4 | 71 | 0.47 | 42 | 1 | 0.02 | F = 27.78, d.f. = 1, p<0.001 | iSR |
G | 113 | 2 | 16 | 0.86 | 55 | 22 | 0.28 | F = 7.341, d.f. = 1, p<0.01 | N |
E1 | 42 | 0 | 53 | 0.44 | 15 | 0 | 0 | F = 10.12, d.f. = 1, p<0.01 | SR |
E2 | 63 | 2 | 115 | 0.35 | 22 | 0 | 0 | F = 16.03, d.f. = 1, p<0.001 | SR |
E3 | 66 | 4 | 95 | 0.4 | 30 | 0 | 0 | F = 22.62, d.f. = 1, p<0.001 | SR |
E4 | 94 | 7 | 30 | 0.72 | 36 | 27 | 0.42 | F = 0.786, d.f. = 1, p = 0.478 | N |
J1 | 74 | 2 | 15 | 0.81 | 27 | 16 | 0.37 | F = 1.403, d.f. = 1, p = 0.278 | N |
J2 | 21 | 0 | 23 | 0.48 | 3 | 0 | 0 | F = 1.645, d.f. = 1, p = 0.4 | SR |
J3 | 52 | 2 | 104 | 0.33 | 16 | 3 | 0.15 | F = 4.8, d.f. = 1, p = 0.025 | iSR |
J4 | 29 | 1 | 34 | 0.45 | 2 | 0 | 0 | F = 1.222, d.f. = 1, p = 0.5 | SR |
J5 | 33 | 0 | 15 | 0.69 | 2 | 2 | 0.5 | F = 0.185, d.f. = 1, p = 0.514 | N |
Hatch rate was measured by comparing the number of hatched eggs (H) to the total number of laid eggs (hatched (H)+grey (G)+yellow (Y)). Sex ratio is given as the proportion of male offspring. Significance p-value using Bonferroni correction was 0.01.