Table 4.
Influence of IBA and activated charcoal (AC) on rooting response from in vitro regenerated shoots of Pithecellobium dulce
| PGR (μM) | % Response | Root Length (cm) | No of roots | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS | IBA | AC | (Mean ± SE) | (Mean ± SE) | (Mean ± SE) |
| MS | 2.46 | 41.63 | 80c ± 6.3 | 5.2b ± 0.3 | 3.4b ± 0.2 |
| MS | 2.46 | 83.26 | 60bc ± 5.0 | 3.2ab ± 0.3 | 1.4a ± 0.2 |
| 1/2MS | 2.46 | 41.63 | 32ab ± 6.6 | 1.6a ± 0.4 | 1.2a ± 0.2 |
| 1/2MS | 2.46 | 83.26 | 20a ± 6.3 | 1.4a ± 0.2 | 1.0a ± 0.0 |
Each treatment consisted of 6 replicates and experiment was repeated twice. Mean with the same letter(s) within the same column are not significantly different at the 5 % level according to Duncan’s multiple range test