Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 6;49(2):142–160. doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0334-z

Table 3.

Recent work conducted on heat pump drying of selected food products

Researchers Application(s) Conclusions
Meyer and Greyvenstein (1992) (South Africa) Grain There is a minimum operating period that makes the HPD more economical than other dryers
Rossi et al. (1992) (Brazil) Vegetable (onion) Drying of sliced onions confirmed energy saving of the order of 30% and better product quality due to shorter processing time.
Mason and Blarcom (1993) (Australia) Macadamia nuts
Strommen and Kramer (1994) (Norway) Marine products (fish) The high quality of the dried products was highlighted as the major advantage of HPD and introducing a temperature controllable program to HPD makes it possible to regulate the product properties such as porosity, rehydration rates, strength, texture and colour.
Prasertsan and Saen-saby (1998); Prasertsan et al. (1997) (Thailand) Agricultural food drying (Bananas) HPD is suitable for drying high moisture materials and the running cost of HPD is cheap making them economically feasible
Chou et al. (1998, 2001); Chua et al. (2000) (Singapore) Agricultural and marine The quality of the agricultural and marine products can be improved with scheduled drying conditions
Products (mushrooms, fruits, sea-cucumber and oyster)
O’Neill et al. (1998) (New Zealand) Apple Produces products with a high level of open pore structure and contributing to the unique physical properties
Strommen et al. (1999) HPD with hydrocarbon and natural working fluids can save significant amounts of energy; ammonia was found most favorable refrigerant in the temperatures (30–80 °C).
Oktay et al. (2003) (Turkey) Wool The SMER was between 0.65 and 1.75 kg/kWh. COP was between 2.47 and 3.95.
Teeboonma et al. (2003) (Thailand) Fruits (papaya and mango glace) Developed and validated mathematical models; the effects of initial moisture content, cubic size and effective diffusion coefficient of products on the optimum conditions of HPD are also investigated. Exergy and energy analysis was made.
Kohayakawa et al. (2004) (Brasil) Mango The energy efficiency improved compared with an electrical resistance dryer
Hawlader et al. (2006) (Singapore) Apple, guava and potato Modified atmosphere heat pump dryer produced better physical properties.
Chegini et al. (2007) (Iran) Plum Optimum temperature of drying for plums is in vicinity of 70–80 °C; also SMER was notably more than conventional dryers.
Aktaş et al. (2009) (Turkey) Apples A system which is composed of the combination of both dryers is considered to be more efficient

Daghigh et al. (2009)