Skip to main content
. 2011 Apr 12;50(2):284–292. doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0350-z

Table 1.

Changes in the proximate composition and pH of fried chicken under different test conditions

Parameters PBM CBM PLM CLM
Moisture (%) 53.9 ± 1.94a 51.3 ± 3.69b 52.5 ± 4.62b 48.5 ± 3.11c
Protein (%) 18.5 ± 1.51a 18.4 ± 1.95a 17.0 ± 2.38 b 17.2 ± 2.49 b
Total fat (%) 15.3 ± 3.06a 19.7 ± 2.97b 14.4 ±1.23 a 18.5 ± 1.37 b
Ash (%) 3.5 ± 0.43a 3.2 ± 0.44a 3.4 ± 0.25a 3.7 ± 0.21b
Carbohydrate (%) 8.8 ± 0.32a 7.4 ± 0.27b 12.7 ± 0.11c 12.0 ± 0.15c
pH 5.7 ± 0.12a 5.7 ± 0.20a 5.8 ± 0.19b 5.9 ± 0.12b

All the values indicate mean ± SD, (n = 4).

Means in a row with a different superscript letter differ (p ≤ 0.05)

PBM Pressure Fried Breast Meat; CBM Conventional Fried Breast Meat; PLM Pressure Fried Leg Meat; CLM Conventional Fried Leg Meat