Skip to main content
. 2011 Feb 11;50(1):115–121. doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0312-5

Table 2.

Statistical results obtained from various thin layer drying models

No. Model name T (°C) Model coefficients R2 RMSE χ2
1 Newton 50 Inline graphic*** 0.9622 0.0649 0.00460
60 Inline graphic*** 0.9678 0.0610 0.01171
70 Inline graphic*** 0.9809 0.0490 0.00431
2 Page 50 Inline graphic***; m = 1.8516*** 0.9622 0.0668 0.00447
60 Inline graphic; m = 1.7118 0.9678 0.0633 0.00401
70 k = 0.0002***; m = 1.5265*** 0.9809 0.0519 0.00528
3 Henderson and Pabis 50 a = 1.0820***; k = 0.0001*** 0.9688 0.0608 0.00550
60 a = 1.0723***; k = 0.0001*** 0.9733 0.0578 0.01702
70 a = 1.0463***; k = 0.0003*** 0.9832 0.0486 0.00376
4 Logarithmic 50 a = 1.1751***; Inline graphic***; c = −0.1326 0.9866 0.0411 0.00169
60 a = 1.1665***; k = 0.0001***; c = −0.1288 0.9894 0.0378 0.00197
70 a = 1.0976***; k = 0.0002***; c = −0.0660 0.9910 0.0381 0.00267
5 Two term exponential 50 a = 1.9348***; k = 0.0002*** 0.9890 0.0361 0.00693
60 a = 1.9200***; k = 0.0002*** 0.9916 0.0324 0.00108
70 a = 1.0000; k = 0.0002 0.9808 0.0521 0.00737
6 Wang and Singh 50 Inline graphic***; Inline graphic*** 0.9969 0.0190 0.00032
60 Inline graphic***; Inline graphic*** 0.9982 0.0149 0.00016
70 a = −0.0002***; Inline graphic*** 0.9921 0.0334 0.00403
7 Modified Henderson and Pabis 50 a = 0.3826; b = 0.3601; c = 0.3355; g = h=k = 0.0001 0.9688 0.0695 0.00719
60 a = 0.3757; b = 0.3611***; c = 0.3355***; g*** = h*** = k=0.0001 0.9733 0.0694 0.02459
70 a = 0.3597; b = 0.3536; c = 0.3330; g = h*** = k = 0.0003 0.9832 0.0688 0.00751
8 Midilli et al. 50 a = 0.9497***; Inline graphic; Inline graphic*, m = 1.596*** 0.9953 0.0236 0.00063
60 a = 0.9651***; Inline graphic; Inline graphic*, m = 1.517*** 0.9959 0.0225 0.00061
70 a = 0.994***; Inline graphic; Inline graphic**, m = 1.407*** 0.9988 0.0125 0.00018

***p < 0.0001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05