Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 22.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychol. 2008 Jul;44(4):1148–1159. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.1148

Table 2.

Linear Growth Models for Life Satisfaction over Chronological Age and Distance-to-Death.

Life satisfaction
Chronological age
Distance-to-death
Parameter Estimate SE Estimate SE
Fixed effects estimates
  Intercept1, a00 42.10 *** (0.45) 42.30 *** (0.39)
  Slope2, a01 − 0.63 *** (0.04) − 1.02 *** (0.05)
Random effects estimates
  Variance intercept 159.78 *** (10.82) 169.76 *** (8.67)
  Variance slope 0.65 *** (0.08) 0.93 *** (0.11)
  Cov. intercept, slope 5.21 * (0.80) 8.85 *** (0.90)
  Residual variance 107.51 *** (1.74) 104.95 *** (1.70)
Number parameters   6   6
−2LL 79,996 79,633
AIC 80,008 79,645

Note. Unstandardized estimates and standard errors are presented.

1

Intercept is centered at age 85 for age-based model, or at death for distance-to-death model;

2

Slope or rate of change is scaled in T-units per year. N = 1,637 who provided 10,162 observations. Scores standardized to a T metric (mean = 50; SD = 10) using the entire SOEP longitudinal sample as the reference frame (mean = 7.02, SD = 1.55, see Lucas et al., 2003). AIC = Akaike Information Criterion; −2LL = −2 Log Likelihood, relative model fit statistics. Cov. = Covariance.

*

p < .05,

***

p < .001.