Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 22.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychol. 2008 Jul;44(4):1148–1159. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.44.4.1148

Table 3.

Multi-Phase Growth Models for Life Satisfaction over Chronological Age and Distance-to-Death.

Life satisfaction
Chronological age
Distance-to-death
Parameter Estimate SE Estimate SE
Fixed effects estimates
  Intercept1, a00 44.67 *** (0.53) 48.14 *** (0.42)
  Change point, k 81.23 *** (0.39) 4.19 *** (0.17)
  Slope 12, a01 − 0.47 *** (0.11) −0.64 *** (0.06)
  Slope 22, a02 − 0.56 *** (0.06) − 1.94 *** (0.15)
Random effects estimates
  Variance intercept 181.23 *** (12.08) 128.60 *** (7.02)
  Variance slope 1 2.11 *** (0.43) 0.78 *** (0.14)
  Variance slope 2 1.38 *** (0.18) 9.11 *** (1.20)
  Cov. intercept, slope 1 − 10.67 *** (2.08) 6.58 *** (0.88)
  Cov. intercept, slope 2 9.45 *** (1.25) − 7.01 ** (2.04)
  Cov. slope 1, slope 2 − 0.61 * (0.26) − 0.16 (0.32)
  Residual variance 103.98 *** (1.71) 97.49 *** (1.66)
Number parameters 11 11
−2LL 79,895 79,423
AIC 79,917 79,445

Note. Unstandardized estimates and standard errors are presented.

1

Intercept is centered at the change point in both models;

2

Slope or rate of change in T-units per year. N = 1,637 who provided 10,162 observations. Scores standardized to a T metric (mean = 50; SD = 10) using the entire SOEP longitudinal sample as the reference frame (mean = 7.02, SD = 1.55, see Lucas et al., 2003). AIC = Akaike Information Criterion; −2LL = −2 Log Likelihood, relative model fit statistics. Cov. = Covariance.

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001.