Table 1.
Studies investigating interventional support for caregivers of patients with AD
| Reference | Interventions | Study design | Inclusion criteria | Results | Comments/conclusions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brennan et al., 1995 [51] | Computer-based support as needed (n = 51) vs. control (n = 51) | Randomised controlled 12-month study | Caregiver: primary caregiver, access to telephone, able to read and write in English; Patient: not specified | Caregivers’ decision-making confidence was improved; Caregivers’ decision-making skill was unaffected; No changes in social isolation | Improvements observed in caregivers’ decision-making confidence alone |
| Mahoney et al., 2003 [21] | Computer-mediated automated interactive voice responsea (n = 49) vs. usual care (n = 51) | Randomised controlled study over a period of 18 months (12 months of treatment and 6 months of follow-up) | Caregiver: ≥18 years, minimum of 4 h care per day for 6 months for patient with impaired ADLs; Patient: MMSE score ≤23 | Significant effect of intervention for caregivers with low mastery at baseline, with decreases in the levels of bother (p = 0.04), anxiety (p = 0.01) and depression (p = 0.007) vs. the control group | Caregivers who exhibited low mastery and high anxiety at baseline benefited the most; The authors concluded that, to optimise outcome effects, similar interventions should be individualised to the caregiver |
| Winter and Gitlin, 2006 [50] | Tele-support linking 5 caregivers per group for 1 h/week (n = 58) vs. usual care (n = 45) | Randomised controlled 6-month study | Caregivers: female, ≥50 years, providing care for ≥6 months, weekly access to telephone for 1 h; Patient: physicians diagnosis of AD or related dementia | Minimal benefits for tele-support vs. usual care: Aged 50–64 years: burden (p = 0.490), gain (p = 0.932), depression (p = 0.121); Aged ≥65 years: burden (p = 0.352), gain (p = 0.086), depression (p = 0.014) | The authors concluded that the benefits of tele-support were minimal and only observed in older female caregivers (aged ≥65 years) |
| Eisdorfer et al., 2003 [55] | SET (n = 75) vs. SET plus CTIS (n = 77) vs. minimal support (n = 73) | Randomised (stratified according to ethnicity) controlled 18-month study (12 months of treatment plus 6 months of follow-up) | Caregiver: cohabit and provide minimum of 4 h care per day for prior 6 months; Additional family member: provide emotional or instrumental support; Patient: MMSE score <24 with impaired ADLs | Reduction in depression in the SET plus CTIS group at 6 months, which differed according to ethnicity (Cuban American or White American) and relationship to patient | Information technology has a promising role in alleviating distress and depression among groups of AD caregivers; Interventions have differential impacts according to ethnic group and the caregiver-patient relationship |
| Mittelman et al., 2004 [47] | Multicomponent, individualised counselling and support (n = 203) vs. usual care (n = 203) | Randomised controlled study (results presented for 4-year analysis) | Caregiver: spouse of patient with AD, cohabiting, and with primary responsibility for care |
|
The authors concluded that psychosocial intervention can provide caregivers with strategies to help them manage their reactions to behaviour problems more effectively |
| Martin-Carrasco et al., 2009 [45] | PIP plus standard care (n = 60) vs. standard care aloneb (n = 55) | Multicentre prospective randomised 10-month study (4 months of treatment plus 6 months of follow-up) | Caregiver: minimum of 4 h per day for patient with impaired ADLs and baseline Zarit score >22; Patient: MMSE score 10–26 and receiving rivastigmine (≥6 mg/day) for prior 6 months | Zarit scale: mean score reduction in PIP group greater than in control group (p = 0.0083); SF-36: mean scores significantly higher in PIP than the control group in all the dimensions (p < 0.05) except for mental health |
|
| Burns et al., 2003 [46] | Training in behaviour management (n = 85) vs. training in behaviour management plus training to cope with stress (n = 82) | Randomised (with stratification according to race and gender) 24-month study | Caregiver: >21 years, minimum of 4 h care per day for ≥6 months; Patient: MMSE score <24 | Behaviour management plus coping skills improved general well-being (p = 0.004) and depression (p = 0.007) over time | The authors conclude that brief primary care interventions may be effective in reducing caregiver distress and burden in the long-term management of AD patients; Interventions that focus only on care recipient behaviour, without addressing care-giving issues, may not be as adequate for reducing caregiver distress as combined approaches |
| Mittelman et al., 2008 [49] | Individual and family counselling with ad hoc telephone counselling plus donepezil treatment for patient (n = 79) vs. donepezil alone (n = 79) | Randomised controlled 24-month study (formalised counselling for 3 months followed by ad hoc counselling and follow-up for 21 months) |
|
|
|
ADLs = Activities of daily living; CTIS = computer/telephone-integrated system (information system and tele-support); GDS = Global Deterioration Scale; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; PIP = psychoeducational interventional program; SET = structural ecosystems therapy (family therapy intervention).
Comprised caregiver stress monitoring and counselling information, personal voice mail linkage to AD experts, a voice mail telephone support group and a distraction call for care recipients.
Standard care comprised individual 90-min sessions, at 1- to 2-week intervals over 4 months, providing general information about how AD progresses, individualised information about the patient, both in person and over the telephone ‘on demand’, information leaflets about AD and information about resources directed at caregivers available in their community.