Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 15;4(1):e00366-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00366-12

TABLE 3 .

Comparison of the dominant subpopulations of the appendix samples A to G and the stool sample (S)

Genus Abundance (%) ina:
A B C D E F G S
Enterobacteriaceae members 9 25 36 9 49 27 25 11
Lachnospiraceae incertae sedis 10 6 11 16
Ruminococcaceae incertae sedis 8 4 3 7 4 6
Fusobacterium 3 8 9 41 7
Lactobacillus 16 4 4 23 7
Bacteroides 7 9 7 7 4 4 5 18
Bifidobacterium 4 3 3 12 15
Eubacterium 10
Streptococcus 10 5
Parvimonas 21 18
Parabacteroides 8
Oscillibacter 3
Gemella 5 3
Faecalibacterium 3 4
Alistipes 5
Mucispirillum 5 5
Allobaculum 9
Blautia 7
Other genera 23 34 28 9 10 27 29 14
Not assigned 11 8
a

 Only genera representing >3% of assignable sequences have values listed here. Values are representative of the relative abundances of total sequences assignable at genus level. All genera representing <3% of assignable sequences are grouped together as “Other genera.”