Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Polit Psychol. 2012 May 28;33(3):395–418. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2012.00883.x

Table 3.

Anger and Compassion as Mediators of Effort Cues

Dependent
Variable
Support for
Stricter
Requirements
Anger Compassion Support for
Stricter
Requirements
Support for
Stricter
Requirements
Anger Compassion

Model 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Intercept .57***
(.03)
.23***
(.03)
.60***
(.04)
.58***
(.06)
.80***
(.06)
.35***
(.06)
.39***
(.06)
Experimental Manipulation
 Lazy Recipient .20***
(.05)
.26***
(.04)
−.20***
(.05)
.09
(.05)
.04
(.08)
.34***
(.08)
−.15*
(.08)
 Unlucky Recipient −.22***
(.05)
−.11*
(.04)
.15**
(.05)
−.16***
(.04)
−.47***
(.08)
−17*
(.07)
.22**
(.08)
Anger .34***
(.08)
Compassion −.15*
(.07)
Ideology −.58***
(.12)
−.30**
(.11)
.53**
(.12)
Ideology * Lazy Recipient .40*
(.17)
−.24
(.16)
−.12
(.18)
Ideology * Unlucky Recipient .64***
(.17)
.13
(.16)
−.15
(.18)
R2 (adj.) .30 .28 .21 .42 .37 .37 .33

Notes. N = 199. Unstandardized OLS regression coefficients, standard errors in parentheses. The control condition is the reference category to which the experimental manipulations are compared. The experimental manipulations are entered as dummy variables measuring whether the subject has (1) or has not (0) been treated with the given manipulation. All variables vary between 0 and 1.

*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***

p < .001.