Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Jan 22.
Published in final edited form as: Appl Spectrosc. 2010 Jul;64(7):750–759. doi: 10.1366/000370210791666183

TABLE III.

Average prediction values obtained for each sample spectra set for each model used in the matching algorithm.a

Sample Model Average
prediction
value
Sample
classification
Sample Model Average
prediction
value
Sample
classification
F AB 0.9005 A K AB 1.0057 A
AC 0.5016 A AC 0.4044 A
AD 0.0303 D AD 0.2201 D
AE 0.5271 A AE 0.3839 A
CD 0.2330 D CD 0.2521 D
CE 0.6691 C CE 0.4311 C
DE 0.9082 D DE 0.6593 D
G AB 0.8990 A L AB 0.9559 A
AC 0.2254 C AC 0.4575 A
AD 0.2747 D AD 0.4307 A
AE 0.3919 A AE 0.5759 A
CD 0.4565 C CD 0.3503 C
CE 0.6765 C CE 0.6613 C
DE 0.6091 D DE 0.7062 D
H AB 0.2996 B M AB 0.2968 B
AC −0.1799   C AC −0.0427   C
AD 0.8302 A AD 0.7863 A
AE 0.4844 A AE 0.4804 A
CD 0.4844 C CD 0.7495 C
CE 1.0455 C CE 0.9532 C
DE 0.0964 E DE 0.0638 E
I AB 0.9170 A N AB 0.9209 A
AC 0.4053 A AC 0.1247 C
AD 0.3723 A AD 0.4193 A
AE 0.5864 A AE 0.2471 E
CD 0.3186 D CD 0.5254 C
CE 0.6698 C CE 0.4657 C
DE 0.8107 D DE 0.0694 E
J AB 0.8368 A O AB 0.8908 A
AC 0.2637 C AC 0.2502 C
AD 0.4206 A AD 0.4729 A
AE 0.2523 E AE 0.2863 E
CD 0.4256 C CD 0.4388 C
CE 0.2917 E CE 0.3676 C
DE 0.1239 E DE 0.1716 E
a

The key models used to match the unknown sample to one of the samples A through E are indicated in bold.