Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 29;10:259. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-10-259

Table 3.

Cosmetic results

  Group 1 (n = 39) Group 2 (n = 26) P-value
 
mean±SD (range)/n (%)
mean±SD (range)/n (%)
 
Nipple reconstruction
 
 
0.128
 No
18 (46.2)
17 (65.4)
 
 Yes
21 (53.8)
9 (34.6)
 
Contralateral procedure
 
 
0.334
 No
38 (97.4)
24 (92.3)
 
 Yes (reduction)
1 (2.6)
2 (7.7)
 
Donor site scar length, cm
17.0 ± 2.8 (7.0 to 24.0)
17.2 ± 1.8 (13.0 to 22.0)
0.788
Breast skin incision
 
 
0.241
 Circum-areolar only
32 (82.1)
24 (92.3)
 
 Other incision added
7 (17.9)
2 (7.7)
 
Breast size symmetry
6.9 ± 2.0 (3.0 to 10.0)
8.7 ± 1.4 (5.0 to 10.0)
<0.001
Visual difference
 
 
0.023
 No
3 (7.7)
9 (34.6)
 
 −5
2 (5.1)
1 (3.8)
 
 −10
4 (10.3)
8 (30.8)
 
 −20
5 (12.8)
2 (7.7)
 
 −30
14 (35.9)
2 (7.7)
 
 −40
2 (5.1)
2 (7.7)
 
 −50
3 (7.7)
2 (7.7)
 
 −60
3 (7.7)
0
 
 −70
2 (5.1)
0
 
 +10
1 (2.6)
0
 
Breast Contour
 
 
0.971
 Good
31 (79.5)
21 (80.8)
 
 Depression
6 (15.4)
4 (15.4)
 
 Bulging
2 (5.1)
1 (3.8)
 
Nipple cosmesis
7.7 ± 1.6 (3.0 to 10.0)
9.0 ± 0.9 (6.0 to10.0)
<0.001
Surgeon assessment
6.9 ± 2.1 (3.0 to 10.0)
8.8 ± 1.3 (5.0 to10.0)
<0.001
Breast clinic nurse assessment 7.2 ± 2.0 (3.0 to 10.0) 9.1 ± 1.0 (6.0 to 10.0) <0.001