Table 3.
Effect of aqueous extract of C. papaya leaf on the hepatic profile in diabetic and non-diabetic rats
|
C. papaya |
ALT |
AST |
ALP |
TB |
DB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (g/100 mL) | (U/L) | (U/L) | (U/L) | (mg/dL) | (mg/dL) |
|
Diabetic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control |
276±16.6a |
345.5±10.4a |
798.4±14.7a |
0.69±0.11a |
0.53±0.09a |
|
0.75 |
61.16±2.9b |
169.5±4.8b |
441±10.6b |
0.35±0.03b |
0.31±0.02b |
|
1.5 |
81.85±14.6b |
187.9±14.1b |
437.7±10.8b |
0.63±0.07 |
0.52±0.08 |
|
3 |
314.9±13.7b |
416.7±16b |
642.6±11.6b |
0.45±0.05b |
0.44±0.08 |
|
Non-diabetic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control |
88.6±2.02 |
285.3±7.9 |
243.6±9.13 |
0.35±0.03 |
0.25±0.02 |
|
0.75 |
66.4±6.3c |
260.4±18.6c |
136.1±3.7c |
0.39±0.01 |
0.25±0.01 |
| 1.5 | 86.5±4.6 | 253.7±9.6c | 109.6±5.5c | 0.55±0.06c | 0.38±0.04c |
Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M; n=6. ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test (p <0.05). astatistically different from non-diabetic rats; bstatistically different from diabetic control and cstatistically different from non-diabetic control.